{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-283",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-283",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Scholarly Growth Domain Specific Trust Qualification",
 "text": "Casals, Fermé, and Brandão independently support the narrower domain-separation principle in Kaal's claim. Their context-aware BDI model structures information into domains and permits one agent to assign different trust or credibility degrees to the same counterpart across those domains. They illustrate the point with a doctor whose medical information deserves different credibility from the same person's sports opinions, and they warn that a global credibility degree can cause accurate domain-specific experience to be discarded. This qualifies Kaal's design choice to maintain reputation by capability domain rather than as one global score. The paper models information-sharing trust in a preliminary formal architecture; it does not implement Kaal's demonstrated-performance REP, institutional validation, or broader governance substrate.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "domain-specific-trust",
  "multi-agent-systems",
  "context-aware-agents"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the six page-bound passages and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: public six-page publisher conference full text with Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar identity agreement; six exact page-bound passages.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification.",
  "The source models domain-specific relative trust and credibility for information shared among context-aware BDI agents, not Kaal's demonstrated-performance REP ledger.",
  "Its information domains are analogous to capability tags but do not specify Kaal's tag creation, update, decay, or cross-domain isolation rules.",
  "The work is explicitly preliminary and provides a formal model rather than production validation or comparative deployment evidence.",
  "It does not require institutional validation, stake, citation-weighting, adjudication, or Kaal's broader governance substrate."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Domain-specific Trust for Context-aware BDI Agents - Preliminary Work",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.5220/0006600602440249"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7260278-025",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-025",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Paper 2 - Architecture of the Agentic Reputation Substrate",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7260278",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "d48801f279dba594e1f3e65d74d31f862261ada6428ea119f948e8d7cfee1db0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-025"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Domain-specific Trust for Context-aware BDI Agents - Preliminary Work",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5220/0006600602440249"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-11:scholarly-growth-7260278-025-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7260278-025.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-283",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-283.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-11:scholarly-growth-7260278-025-domain-specific-trust-01",
 "evidenceLevel": "public six-page publisher conference full text with Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar identity agreement; six exact page-bound passages",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.99,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source independently rejects undifferentiated credibility for multi-agent learning and assigns different trust values to the same agent across defined information domains.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "SCITEPRESS publisher full text",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.5220/0006600602440249",
  "doi": "10.5220/0006600602440249",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.5220/0006600602440249",
  "pdfUrl": "https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2018/66006/66006.pdf",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-11T23:08:56.535Z",
  "sourcePdfSha256": "469eaac25a02a6e11d2e6c304c664164c0b3ba1a39e0978d6d11c5365f55c521",
  "extractedTextSha256": "aa06d79e29f32a2719a3a4be8c7c398af0672ce5baf4a1620d7433e7e143039c",
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "pdftotext -raw and -layout",
   "quality": "clean machine-readable six-page publisher PDF; six exact passages verified on PDF pages 1, 2, and 5"
  },
  "crossrefMetadataSha256": "0e0e9b512a997322bdd9830613c13c3e3d2c1e5008affbfe844912f709a6c801",
  "openAlexMetadataSha256": "dec82aac35e53f2189b42b4de0fc5a7a41bb203450feaf0a90526d1808811095",
  "semanticScholarMetadataSha256": "63ac4f0b2e47a2fa12d681119ad7e2b5999d1ddfe21be0189437f1e81732b38e",
  "sourceProposition": "Casals, Fermé, and Brandão structure contextual information into information domains and give an agent different relative-trust or credibility degrees for the same counterpart across those domains; they explain that a single global credibility degree can suppress accurate domain-specific experience.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e9f1e44e074066f2029a61c6f7747eb403725b6c4997cde50e8ae14bc9ac9a56",
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "58f709e3a031f89b241e4130a7caca06c0b08b7db6e19eb83383e1799fe6cf3c",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "Contextual information can be divided and structured in the form of information domains.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 1,
     "section": "Abstract"
    },
    "sha256": "a25d89e814d0e2a83c411dcec4075b93e3888dc740858a1bc941bad582a35756"
   },
   {
    "text": "establishing a trust model between agents can take into account the relative perceptions each agent has of the others, as well as different trust degrees for different information domains.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 1,
     "section": "Abstract"
    },
    "sha256": "bf68844a64ae6e25e4d21a013e33934b8cab39b1973e8ddf00ffb8dc509032c4"
   },
   {
    "text": "Such mechanism will allow for each agent to possess different trust degrees associated with other agents regarding different information domains.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 1,
     "section": "Abstract"
    },
    "sha256": "ae523e391a49e6cbb733ad8a61fb348cebc693f628163ad40e5dced6fd44befe"
   },
   {
    "text": "information provided by doctors on medical matters and sports are subject to different credibility degrees.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 2,
     "section": "Introduction"
    },
    "sha256": "bb4429422b288ff52ecd5f3e29d2aa2a0b1c1353d45f2281257d825942dee84e"
   },
   {
    "text": "a global credibility (or trustworthiness) degree from any other agent.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 5,
     "section": "Domain-specific Relative Trust"
    },
    "sha256": "76fd0e29107842a18547c6fa4593f38c4a05fadf7e6d08767326f8e802805df8"
   },
   {
    "text": "a global credibility degree can have a negative impact in the overall belief revision process.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "publisher conference PDF",
     "pdfPage": 5,
     "section": "Domain-specific Relative Trust"
    },
    "sha256": "b0a3c6dc4c98d370e18ec93705192d497a78a981473fdf56798b102245c35322"
   }
  ],
  "workId": "work:doi:10.5220/0006600602440249",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Arthur Casals",
   "Eduardo Fermé",
   "Anarosa A. F. Brandão"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2018",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.5220/0006600602440249",
   "pdf:469eaac25a02a6e11d2e6c304c664164c0b3ba1a39e0978d6d11c5365f55c521",
   "proposition:e9f1e44e074066f2029a61c6f7747eb403725b6c4997cde50e8ae14bc9ac9a56"
  ],
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7260278-025",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7260278-025",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.99,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The source independently rejects undifferentiated credibility for multi-agent learning and assigns different trust values to the same agent across defined information domains.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-11T23:08:56.535Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "retractionOrSupersessionFound": false,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "different relative-trust or credibility values for the same agent indexed by information domain instead of one global value",
   "compatibleScope": "context-aware BDI multi-agent information exchange used only to qualify capability-domain separation",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "sameSourceDistinctionVerified": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The source models domain-specific relative trust and credibility for information shared among context-aware BDI agents, not Kaal's demonstrated-performance REP ledger.",
    "Its information domains are analogous to capability tags but do not specify Kaal's tag creation, update, decay, or cross-domain isolation rules.",
    "The work is explicitly preliminary and provides a formal model rather than production validation or comparative deployment evidence.",
    "It does not require institutional validation, stake, citation-weighting, adjudication, or Kaal's broader governance substrate."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth qualification and the unchanged 5,145 scholarly claims under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "682cab23d37b9af0602c0a2a139f9558192cb5910ea450fdefbf61c254b05acf"
}