{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-308",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-308",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Experimental Economics Qualifies Fixed Cohort Institutional Comparison",
 "text": "Bougherara, Muller, and Teyssier qualify Kaal's controlled comparison. They explain that experimental economics isolates a causal effect by changing one environmental or institutional feature at a time. Within-subject designs can hold the participants constant across treatments, but they also create an order-effect risk. This supports the methodological rationale for keeping the labor force and work assignment fixed while varying the institution. The correspondence remains narrow. The chapter states a general experimental principle. It does not verify that Kaal's cohort, tasks, or timing were actually held constant. It also does not establish randomization, counterbalancing, independence across conditions, or the validity of any later estimate.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "research-methods",
  "institutional-design",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "experimental-design",
  "causal-inference",
  "institutional-comparison"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the two evidence-bound passages and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: complete public NCBI Bookshelf chapter with DOI, authors, date, section-bound evidence, and immutable HTML bytes.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification.",
  "The chapter states a general principle of experimental design. It does not audit Kaal's cohort, assignments, execution, or data.",
  "Holding the same participants across treatments removes one sample-comparability problem but creates order and carryover risks.",
  "The source does not establish randomization, counterbalancing, independence across conditions, or the validity of any later estimate.",
  "Semantic Scholar rate-limited the general search and six inherited identity refreshes. Two DOI lookups returned no current record.",
  "The bounded review used fresh English, German, and Spanish Crossref and OpenAlex searches, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, NCBI Bookshelf, Crossref DOI, OpenAlex DOI, and web literature.",
  "The chapter reports DOI 10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4, but the DOI resolver returned HTTP 404 in this run. The public position therefore uses the verified HTTP 200 NCBI Bookshelf URL."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Experimental economics: highlighting the preferences and factors influencing people's decision making",
  "url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK607751/"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7261018-011",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-011",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-011"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Experimental economics: highlighting the preferences and factors influencing people's decision making",
   "url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK607751/"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-011-reviewed-v2",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7261018-011.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-308",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-308.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-011-experimental-economics-02",
 "evidenceLevel": "complete public NCBI Bookshelf chapter with DOI, authors, date, section-bound evidence, and immutable HTML bytes",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.96,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The chapter independently states the experimental rationale for varying one institutional feature at a time and explains how within-subject comparison holds participants constant. It qualifies the claim because it also identifies order effects and does not verify Kaal's implementation.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "complete public scholarly book chapter independently bound through NCBI Bookshelf and DOI metadata",
  "sourceRecordId": "doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK607751/",
  "publicFullTextUrl": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK607751/",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-12T12:16:31.389Z",
  "publicHtmlSha256": "30dca0ee769678adadeccabb469440a3a966bbb3c7cfdd36bb70185ce0676532",
  "publicHtmlBytes": 89845,
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "normalized NCBI Bookshelf full-text HTML",
   "quality": "complete searchable chapter with title, authors, DOI, section structure, and exact evidence fragments"
  },
  "sourceProposition": "Bougherara, Muller, and Teyssier explain that experimental treatments should change one environmental or institutional feature at a time to isolate its causal effect. They add that within-subject comparisons keep the participant sample constant across treatments but introduce order-effect risk.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "dd8f19a5989449ef886c788df41e384a38bcdefbb4f1eb187237990e0ed2fe83",
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "6a5edfdce4ef061ae371e747ee5688891776dc5f91edc1e937f9dd26e7b743e0",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "only one change be made at a time",
    "locator": {
     "version": "NCBI Bookshelf chapter NBK607751",
     "section": "Methodological approach to experimental economics, Treatments",
     "htmlSha256": "30dca0ee769678adadeccabb469440a3a966bbb3c7cfdd36bb70185ce0676532"
    },
    "sha256": "62f89d429528027f7f9fae24c7a70909211962075f4248cbd913594f1e419fe6"
   },
   {
    "text": "the same subjects participated in the different treatments",
    "locator": {
     "version": "NCBI Bookshelf chapter NBK607751",
     "section": "Methodological approach to experimental economics, Treatments",
     "htmlSha256": "30dca0ee769678adadeccabb469440a3a966bbb3c7cfdd36bb70185ce0676532"
    },
    "sha256": "8baa3d3881b0b8b56e4c8c4223e87ee3c0b11490cca675f0658608770ae68e74"
   }
  ],
  "reportedDoi": "10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4",
  "reportedDoiResolverStatus": 404,
  "workId": "work:doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Douadia Bougherara",
   "Laurent Muller",
   "Sabrina Teyssier"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4",
   "ncbi-bookshelf:NBK607751",
   "html:30dca0ee769678adadeccabb469440a3a966bbb3c7cfdd36bb70185ce0676532",
   "proposition:dd8f19a5989449ef886c788df41e384a38bcdefbb4f1eb187237990e0ed2fe83"
  ],
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7261018-011",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-011",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.96,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The chapter independently states the experimental rationale for varying one institutional feature at a time and explains how within-subject comparison holds participants constant. It qualifies the claim because it also identifies order effects and does not verify Kaal's implementation.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-12T12:16:31.389Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "retractionOrSupersessionFound": false,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "controlled comparison varies one institutional feature while holding the participant sample and task structure constant",
   "compatibleScope": "qualification limited to the methodological rationale for Kaal's prospective matched institutional comparison",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "sameSourceDistinctionVerified": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The chapter states a general principle of experimental design. It does not audit Kaal's cohort, assignments, execution, or data.",
    "Holding the same participants across treatments removes one sample-comparability problem but creates order and carryover risks.",
    "The source does not establish randomization, counterbalancing, independence across conditions, or the validity of any later estimate.",
    "Semantic Scholar rate-limited the general search and six inherited identity refreshes. Two DOI lookups returned no current record.",
    "The bounded review used fresh English, German, and Spanish Crossref and OpenAlex searches, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, NCBI Bookshelf, Crossref DOI, OpenAlex DOI, and web literature.",
    "The chapter reports DOI 10.35690/978-2-7592-3664-0/c4, but the DOI resolver returned HTTP 404 in this run. The public position therefore uses the verified HTTP 200 NCBI Bookshelf URL."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth qualification and the protected scholarly claims matching the current bridge checkpoint under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "a39eff305d6883e789480a135cd7630726f40e50b3639f58580434d405ec435c"
}