{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-310",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-310",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Preregistration Methods Qualify Registered Design Control",
 "text": "Rubin qualifies Kaal's registered design claim. Preregistration places planned hypotheses, methods, and analyses in a time-stamped record before data collection and analysis. That historical record allows readers to identify deviations between the plan and the reported study. The correspondence is limited. The source does not verify that Kaal's hypotheses, metric definitions, correction procedure, or analysis plan were fixed before each condition ran. It also argues that preregistration supplies historical transparency, not a complete credibility judgment, when current rationales, open materials, code, and robustness checks are available. Kaal's claim therefore describes a relevant design control. Its execution and evidentiary weight still depend on the preserved registration, disclosed deviations, and the study record.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "research-methods",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "preregistration",
  "research-transparency"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the four evidence-bound passages and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: complete public 15-page open journal article with DOI, author identity, section-bound passages, and immutable published PDF bytes.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification.",
  "The source does not verify Kaal's registration, preservation, timing, or adherence for any condition.",
  "The source treats preregistration as historical transparency and argues that it is not a complete credibility assessment when contemporary transparency is available.",
  "The source does not test Kaal's metric definitions, multiple-testing correction, analysis plan, cohort, or results.",
  "Semantic Scholar rate-limited both the bounded search and retained-work lookup. The official Nosek article and PDF returned access challenges, so its verified abstract and identity metadata were reviewed but not promoted.",
  "The bounded review used fresh English, German, and Spanish Crossref and OpenAlex searches, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, web primary literature, the journal, Crossref DOI, and OpenAlex DOI."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?",
  "url": "https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol16-4/p376/"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7261018-013",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-013",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-013"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?",
   "url": "https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol16-4/p376/"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-013-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7261018-013.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-310",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-310.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-013-rubin-01",
 "evidenceLevel": "complete public 15-page open journal article with DOI, author identity, section-bound passages, and immutable published PDF bytes",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth qualification",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.96,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The paper directly defines the preregistration timing and preservation mechanism while limiting what that mechanism proves about study credibility and execution.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "complete public journal article independently bound through the journal, Crossref, OpenAlex, and an author-posted arXiv version",
  "sourceRecordId": "doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376",
  "publicFullTextUrl": "https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol16-4/p376/p376.pdf",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-12T13:44:49.584Z",
  "publicPdfSha256": "53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b",
  "publicPdfBytes": 357158,
  "publicHtmlSha256": "c3d18a36a109f12c08d20b2035d73c68c1a93519efde4cae9a6987c846696584",
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "pdftotext 25.06.0 layout mode",
   "quality": "complete searchable 15-page published journal article with title, author, DOI, page numbers, headings, and exact evidence passages"
  },
  "sourceProposition": "Rubin defines preregistration as a time-stamped record of planned hypotheses, methods, and analyses made before data collection and analysis. The record allows later comparison of the plan and reported study. Rubin limits the mechanism to historical transparency and argues that it does not by itself establish credibility when contemporary transparency is available.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "1457fbd988273d8d4a36c56e1aa60fd4254b832c37c1238c3de540eebdd68f98",
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "62429a3a6f1595b53e96b2f8ddfd3d87f3fbee250d0206e618bd62c40302c587",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "Preregistration entails researchers registering their planned research hypotheses, methods, and analyses in a time-stamped document before they undertake their data collection and analyses.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "published journal PDF and landing page",
     "page": 376,
     "section": "Abstract",
     "pdfSha256": "53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b"
    },
    "sha256": "26844685698403837fea324fab03883fd35dc1b68b3e28b17f5ade9944150d04"
   },
   {
    "text": "This document is then made available with the published research report to allow readers to identify discrepancies between what the researchers originally planned to do and what they actually ended up doing.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "published journal PDF and landing page",
     "page": 376,
     "section": "Abstract",
     "pdfSha256": "53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b"
    },
    "sha256": "c89a9c354c17d0e4e2cedf9f236c060837fcf6585181d92453cf8f278d747208"
   },
   {
    "text": "Preregistration only provides historical transparency. It does not provide contemporary transparency.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "published journal PDF",
     "page": 377,
     "section": "Introduction",
     "pdfSha256": "53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b"
    },
    "sha256": "dd13dab0e1573f7ab027835a70cf7d5a58b6c4f825195b2555fd636276263829"
   },
   {
    "text": "Preregistration's historical transparency can be used to detect HARKing. If hypotheses are included in a preregistration document, then hypothesis generation must have occurred before hypothesis testing.",
    "locator": {
     "version": "published journal PDF",
     "page": 377,
     "section": "Identifying HARKing",
     "pdfSha256": "53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b"
    },
    "sha256": "a734f72bee4b3fe2078cc2b9e920704363cca6d90456823a4a34515b2b3aac8b"
   }
  ],
  "workId": "work:doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Mark Rubin"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2020-05-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376",
   "arxiv:2010.10513",
   "pdf:53567d4367a321ffd958afcdd8d10f34543cbd16e154ae9785db1b01c6154f3b",
   "proposition:1457fbd988273d8d4a36c56e1aa60fd4254b832c37c1238c3de540eebdd68f98"
  ],
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7261018-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-013",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.96,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The paper directly defines the preregistration timing and preservation mechanism while limiting what that mechanism proves about study credibility and execution.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-12T13:44:49.584Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "retractionOrSupersessionFound": false,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "a time-stamped record fixes planned hypotheses, methods, and analyses before data collection and enables later deviation checks",
   "compatibleScope": "qualification limited to the preregistration mechanism and its evidentiary limits",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "sameSourceDistinctionVerified": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The source does not verify Kaal's registration, preservation, timing, or adherence for any condition.",
    "The source treats preregistration as historical transparency and argues that it is not a complete credibility assessment when contemporary transparency is available.",
    "The source does not test Kaal's metric definitions, multiple-testing correction, analysis plan, cohort, or results.",
    "Semantic Scholar rate-limited both the bounded search and retained-work lookup. The official Nosek article and PDF returned access challenges, so its verified abstract and identity metadata were reviewed but not promoted.",
    "The bounded review used fresh English, German, and Spanish Crossref and OpenAlex searches, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, web primary literature, the journal, Crossref DOI, and OpenAlex DOI."
   ]
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth qualification and the protected scholarly claims matching the current bridge checkpoint under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "8e59e7fee2ee43cd89a7b3d60f85c2cb93b53a507f14496739a995d7ba434c99"
}