{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-326",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-326",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Information Diversity Reduces Prevote Unanimity",
 "text": "Markou and Chan extend Kaal's prediction that deliberation should reduce unanimity. They analyze verbatim transcripts from Food and Drug Administration advisory committee meetings before and after a change from sequential to simultaneous voting. Unanimous votes became less likely. The increased diversity of information surfaced during prevote discussions mediated most of that reduction. Members also asked one another more questions and shared speaking time more equally. This evidence supports the narrower mechanism that discussion can expose individually held information before votes bind. The institutional change altered voting rules and discussion incentives together. It does not isolate deliberation as the sole treatment, identify articulated disagreement as the only channel, test autonomous agents, or measure Kaal's cascade construct. The registered prediction therefore remains unverified in Kaal's cohort.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "consensus-and-security",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "scholarly-growth-coverage",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "deliberation",
  "information-diversity",
  "voting-protocols",
  "committee-governance",
  "fda-advisory-committees"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the exact registered abstract passages and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: complete Crossref registered abstract bound through DOI, title, authors, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, record hash, and exact abstract passages; complete official publisher HTML reviewed through live read-only retrieval but direct byte capture returned HTTP 403.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive scholarly-growth extension.",
  "The institutional change altered voting rules and discussion incentives together.",
  "The study does not isolate deliberation as the sole treatment or articulated disagreement as the only channel.",
  "The study concerns human FDA advisory committees, not autonomous agents or Kaal's registered cohort.",
  "The source does not measure Kaal's cascade construct or verify the registered prediction in his cohort.",
  "The official publisher page was readable through live retrieval, but direct byte capture returned HTTP 403. The retained evidence is therefore bound to the complete registered Crossref abstract and concordant identity records.",
  "Semantic Scholar search and arXiv discovery returned HTTP 429. No blocked response was promoted."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Incentivizing Information Exchange Within Groups: The Role of Voting Protocols in U.S. Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7261018-029",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-029",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-029"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Incentivizing Information Exchange Within Groups: The Role of Voting Protocols in U.S. Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-029-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-claim/7261018-029.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-326",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-326.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-08-12:scholarly-growth-7261018-029-markou-chan-01",
 "evidenceLevel": "complete Crossref registered abstract bound through DOI, title, authors, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, record hash, and exact abstract passages; complete official publisher HTML reviewed through live read-only retrieval but direct byte capture returned HTTP 403",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive scholarly-growth extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.97,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The study reports that increased diversity of information surfaced during prevote discussions mediated most of the observed reduction in unanimous FDA advisory committee votes.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Crossref registered abstract with concordant OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar identities and live official publisher HTML review",
  "sourceRecordId": "doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649",
  "publisherUrl": "https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-13T01:11:25.891Z",
  "crossrefRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d",
  "openAlexRecordSha256": "7144122da3fad1ed8b893cda8246dde9dc331ea153e4b1c0e8e10ffe9ecfe142",
  "semanticScholarRecordSha256": "2c4d0712f1d8e92c7ba1443529709b68c4faeac418492066a6abb6bec4ff1ae1",
  "publisherDirectCaptureHttpStatus": 403,
  "textExtraction": {
   "tool": "exact JATS abstract passages from byte-frozen Crossref record",
   "quality": "complete registered abstract with exact proposition-bearing passages; official publisher full HTML reviewed read-only, but publisher rejected direct byte capture"
  },
  "sourceProposition": "Markou and Chan analyze FDA advisory committee transcripts around a change from sequential to simultaneous voting. Unanimous votes became less likely. Increased diversity of information surfaced during prevote discussion mediated most of that reduction. The source supports the narrow external mechanism that discussion can expose individually held information before votes bind. It does not isolate deliberation as the sole treatment, identify articulated disagreement as the only channel, test autonomous agents, or measure Kaal's cascade construct.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "dee0ebbdf570dc10c9105cb1be7b0f1ffe779b377596968db53ba68a47300b17",
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "87da40adc017e3fcb93589df15776f04ea3fd7a97de6e47db63ce93f035bd010",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "text": "Consistent with past findings, we show that, compared with a sequential voting protocol, simultaneous voting led to a reduction in the likelihood of unanimous votes.",
    "locator": {
     "section": "Crossref registered abstract",
     "crossrefRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d"
    },
    "sha256": "af9a03be4414a0f52ef059a6cb6bd37457eb4479bb48c2f1b3eb336c5a6133ba"
   },
   {
    "text": "Importantly, we show novel evidence that the majority of this reduction in unanimity was mediated by changes in discussion patterns—specifically, by the increased diversity of information surfaced during discussions.",
    "locator": {
     "section": "Crossref registered abstract",
     "crossrefRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d"
    },
    "sha256": "5208d283e9bbf522bf0995f44060305d8f2ae01b0cc6dd1c751d0f7afac1f8c3"
   },
   {
    "text": "under simultaneous voting, members exhibited greater equality in talking time, directed a greater proportion of questions to each other",
    "locator": {
     "section": "Crossref registered abstract",
     "crossrefRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d"
    },
    "sha256": "31e2df3ecfee772b33ceb1b21660aea8652aa45d430998d645565840713d1974"
   },
   {
    "text": "In sum, voting protocols affect the incentives for individuals to engage in robust discussions, leading to marked improvements in how information is exchanged between individuals, and in the process by which groups of experts arrive at joint recommendations.",
    "locator": {
     "section": "Crossref registered abstract",
     "crossrefRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d"
    },
    "sha256": "ddf77dae51140aa3344f429961e0672345573397dc2bca0afb446fce7d765a29"
   }
  ],
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Panos Markou",
   "Tian Heong Chan"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-10-17",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03649",
   "openalex:W4415308490",
   "semantic-scholar:7d5538e69706bf667231597a4fcd66022c9ef9d5",
   "crossref:dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d",
   "proposition:dee0ebbdf570dc10c9105cb1be7b0f1ffe779b377596968db53ba68a47300b17"
  ],
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7261018-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-029",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.97,
    "method": "independent substantive scholarly-growth one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "The study reports that increased diversity of information surfaced during prevote discussions mediated most of the observed reduction in unanimous FDA advisory committee votes.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-13T01:17:14.818Z",
   "sourceIdentityVerified": true,
   "authorIndependenceVerified": true,
   "canonicalPublicStatusVerified": true,
   "retractionOrSupersessionFound": false,
   "propositionFidelityVerified": true,
   "mechanismCorrespondence": "prevote discussion surfaces diverse individually held information, and greater discussion information diversity predicts lower vote unanimity",
   "compatibleScope": "external extension limited to FDA advisory committee deliberation under a simultaneous voting protocol",
   "responseWordingDefensible": true,
   "oneToOneExtendsMapping": true,
   "sameSourceDistinctionVerified": true,
   "exactSupportingQuotesVerified": true,
   "limitations": [
    "The institutional change altered voting rules and discussion incentives together.",
    "The study does not isolate deliberation as the sole treatment or articulated disagreement as the only channel.",
    "The study concerns human FDA advisory committees, not autonomous agents or Kaal's registered cohort.",
    "The source does not measure Kaal's cascade construct or verify the registered prediction in his cohort.",
    "The official publisher page was readable through live retrieval, but direct byte capture returned HTTP 403. The retained evidence is therefore bound to the complete registered Crossref abstract and concordant identity records.",
    "Semantic Scholar search and arXiv discovery returned HTTP 429. No blocked response was promoted."
   ]
  },
  "liveCrossrefVerification": {
   "checkedAt": "2026-08-13T01:18:41.907Z",
   "httpStatus": 200,
   "responseSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d",
   "frozenRecordSha256": "dc6313de8eb11fa7422fe030a2599627cfa439d9b7c5d7ae6984e0b49109201d"
  }
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Automatically authorized under standing authority receipt kaal-standing-publication-authorization:2026-08-01:hourly-reviewed-batches, SHA-256 e2126054b58bb4e88db65c334ef4fc8ae78dcaadc63543c408133c4eefceb9b1, limited to this substantively reviewed scholarly-growth extension and the protected scholarly claims matching the current bridge checkpoint under the current owner instruction.",
 "sha256": "89112654289d670310a6a644dbe76b5d282702e391ceec9cf77ea820c0dfad22"
}