{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-371",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-08-371",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Blockchain Technologies Probability Of Double Spend Attack On A Proof Of Stake Consensus 4A40Bf47",
 "text": "Blockchain Technologies: Probability of Double-Spend Attack on a Proof-of-Stake Consensus quantifies two attack strategies. Their success probabilities depend on network parameters and confirmation depth. The authors use those results to derive the number of confirmations a vendor should await before delivering goods or services. These findings extend Kaal's claim that fixed consensus rules cannot eliminate strategic attacks by independent nodes. Transaction finality and confirmation depth bound, but do not remove, proof-of-stake double-spend risk. Only the Crossref-indexed abstract passed because the publisher PDF returned HTTP 403. No inference reaches every proof-of-stake protocol.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-08",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-08",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "consensus-and-security",
  "regulatory-failure",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref",
  "evidence-provenance"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the exact Crossref proposition and the one mapped Kaal claim.",
  "External evidence level: current Crossref record, frozen review receipt, and exact evidence passages.",
  "Mapping review tier: independent substantive general-literature extension.",
  "The retained evidence is limited to the Crossref-indexed abstract because the publisher PDF returned HTTP 403.",
  "The result does not establish the same attack probability across every proof-of-stake protocol.",
  "The publisher PDF returned HTTP 403. No full-text inference was used."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Blockchain Technologies: Probability of Double-Spend Attack on a Proof-of-Stake Consensus",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196408"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3125827-001",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-001",
  "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827",
  "paper": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-001"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Blockchain Technologies: Probability of Double-Spend Attack on a Proof-of-Stake Consensus",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196408"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-08-08:continuous-crossref-0036-all-0106-reviewed-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/by-date/2026-08-08.html",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-371",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-08-371.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-08-08:ace26f77761e4a40bf47",
 "evidenceLevel": "Current Crossref record with immutable review receipt",
 "reviewTier": "independent substantive general-literature extension",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.62,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source quantifies two proof-of-stake double-spend strategies and identifies network parameters and confirmation depth as determinants of attack success. This extends Kaal's claim by supplying an independently stated attack mechanism and measurable boundary conditions for strategic consensus gaming.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.3390/s21196408",
  "queryId": "concept:1e8ed2c1f331",
  "queryText": "proof of stake governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196408",
  "doi": "10.3390/s21196408",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.3390/s21196408",
   "Crossref": "10.3390/s21196408"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-10T09:22:49.733Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "9c4c518f5daddcd6b10b2e5cbbe46fb447f320b5f69fde4df1ce857247287288",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "e0878b5f4e449e36ad4d3a8cb56dbc0a259ce23600a081826048df986f3529d4",
  "inputLine": 17751,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.3390/s21196408",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Mikolaj Karpinski",
   "Lyudmila Kovalchuk",
   "Roman Kochan",
   "Roman Oliynykov",
   "Mariia Rodinko",
   "Lukasz Wieclaw"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2021-09-25",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.3390/s21196408",
   "crossref:10.3390/s21196408",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196408",
   "title:39e861cc39078c66f889341f",
   "proposition:957daf9b525cd4fee65f255b4c14a07b9b32a7d4ad4ae01ab4d57a1af4b02a9a"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "For each strategy, the probability of its success is obtained, which depends on the network parameters and the number of confirmation blocks.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "f991cbd19f1354c7a43d44df8937296ee76eedc0aaeeb3e6d6c39a5d2fabf09b",
  "sourceEvidencePassages": [
   {
    "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 1",
    "text": "Two double-spend attack strategies on a proof-of-stake consensus are considered.",
    "sha256": "7f2195db64b8aa17eef3e6d9f12a94fb03f8c4f5578105214af610b81afec8dc"
   },
   {
    "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 2",
    "text": "For each strategy, the probability of its success is obtained, which depends on the network parameters and the number of confirmation blocks.",
    "sha256": "f991cbd19f1354c7a43d44df8937296ee76eedc0aaeeb3e6d6c39a5d2fabf09b"
   },
   {
    "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 3",
    "text": "These results can be used to define how many confirmation blocks a vendor should wait after a correspondent transaction before sending goods or services.",
    "sha256": "8e62d67a5a2015b3b6060b36c5acb9319af52d0878636d867ed98347881fc765"
   }
  ],
  "sourceEvidenceSetSha256": "e7e8232d4a704f71270d2361cc966f486509c636d963f0debf140ddb4066fa7b",
  "currentCrossrefRecordSha256": "49b64e696a08ab070fee0a8805d4d3470b98b189d914439201866a2caef94f8c",
  "currentCrossrefCheckedAt": "2026-08-14T17:49:52.860Z",
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125827-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-001",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.62,
    "method": "complete-corpus source-proposition mechanism and scope adjudication",
    "whyRelevant": "The source quantifies two proof-of-stake double-spend strategies and identifies network parameters and confirmation depth as determinants of attack success. This extends Kaal's claim by supplying an independently stated attack mechanism and measurable boundary conditions for strategic consensus gaming.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ],
  "substantiveReview": {
   "disposition": "retained",
   "reviewVersion": "kaal-public-reactivation-substantive-review-v1",
   "reviewedAt": "2026-08-14T17:48:18.236Z",
   "reviewer": "Codex continuous substantive reviewer",
   "rationale": "The source quantifies two proof-of-stake double-spend strategies and identifies network parameters and confirmation depth as determinants of attack success. This extends Kaal's claim by supplying an independently stated attack mechanism and measurable boundary conditions for strategic consensus gaming.",
   "limitations": [
    "The retained evidence is limited to the Crossref-indexed abstract because the publisher PDF returned HTTP 403.",
    "The result does not establish the same attack probability across every proof-of-stake protocol."
   ],
   "sourceIdentity": {
    "status": "verified",
    "source": "Current Crossref REST record plus immutable provider receipt",
    "doi": "10.3390/s21196408",
    "title": "Blockchain Technologies: Probability of Double-Spend Attack on a Proof-of-Stake Consensus",
    "authors": [
     "Mikolaj Karpinski",
     "Lyudmila Kovalchuk",
     "Roman Kochan",
     "Roman Oliynykov",
     "Mariia Rodinko",
     "Lukasz Wieclaw"
    ],
    "checkedAt": "2026-08-14T17:48:18.236Z",
    "responseBodySha256": "49b64e696a08ab070fee0a8805d4d3470b98b189d914439201866a2caef94f8c",
    "providerReceipt": {
     "path": null,
     "sha256": "78bc58e2dadf387f1d939b12388a9d57dcad8cbf0ad4e116cd838e7ae0e1b3b1",
     "unavailableFromCurrentReceiptDirectory": true
    }
   },
   "independentRationale": "The authors are not Wulf A. Kaal, and the deposited Crossref references contain no Kaal-authored reference. The relationship is limited to independently stated source propositions and evidence passages.",
   "evidencePassages": [
    {
     "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 1",
     "text": "Two double-spend attack strategies on a proof-of-stake consensus are considered.",
     "sha256": "7f2195db64b8aa17eef3e6d9f12a94fb03f8c4f5578105214af610b81afec8dc"
    },
    {
     "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 2",
     "text": "For each strategy, the probability of its success is obtained, which depends on the network parameters and the number of confirmation blocks.",
     "sha256": "f991cbd19f1354c7a43d44df8937296ee76eedc0aaeeb3e6d6c39a5d2fabf09b"
    },
    {
     "locator": "Crossref abstract, passage 3",
     "text": "These results can be used to define how many confirmation blocks a vendor should wait after a correspondent transaction before sending goods or services.",
     "sha256": "8e62d67a5a2015b3b6060b36c5acb9319af52d0878636d867ed98347881fc765"
    }
   ],
   "nonOverlap": {
    "candidateIdMatches": false,
    "canonicalUrlMatches": false,
    "propositionHashMatches": false
   },
   "m1Validation": {
    "status": "M1-PASS-WITH-LIMITS",
    "deterministicGate": "pass",
    "hardFailures": 0,
    "warnings": 0,
    "reason": "Short positions passed hard mandates and strict deterministic checks. Private canonical claim bytes controlled grounding because the user prohibited GB10 access."
   }
  },
  "privateCompilationFreezeSha256": "67f3a6af7b15bc25c7deccf162ba396d6ca3386171b87e1ce6bf058c919bf243"
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Authorized by Wulf A. Kaal on 2026-08-15 for public corpus publication under public-reactivation authority SHA-256 87aad20196a753015a36d970f742c885eb763efdbada4869949bfffe3298130c. Publication remains receipt-bound to successful GitHub Pages deployment and exact live-byte verification.",
 "sha256": "1b6993119a01208cd52ebf51931816b6e4ee72c860aa3863f76ac678971b515d"
}