{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-28-005",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-08-28-005",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Context Indexed Reputation Extends Domain Specificity",
 "text": "Mui, Mohtashemi, and Halberstadt provide a formal basis for Kaal's domain-specificity commitment. Their model indexes an agent's reputation by context and by the evaluating agent, and encounter history is accumulated within a context rather than globally. They state that cross-context estimation is not addressed and identify vectorized quantities as a simple design direction. This extends Kaal's non-transfer rule: without an explicit cross-context estimator, silent domain transfer is not licensed by the model. The source does not test silent-transfer harms, measure how often implementations discard context, or attribute context collapse to display convenience. The reviewed evidence is the authors' PostScript copy, not publisher PDF bytes.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-08-28",
 "dateModified": "2026-08-28",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "governance-design",
  "decentralization",
  "ai-and-agents"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "Authors' PostScript evidence rather than publisher PDF bytes.",
  "Cross-context estimation and silent transfer are not evaluated.",
  "No evidence on implementation prevalence or display convenience."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "A Computational Model of Trust and Reputation",
  "url": "https://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/lmui/papers.html"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:7314479-045",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-045",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-045"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "A Computational Model of Trust and Reputation",
   "url": "https://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/lmui/papers.html"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-growth:2026-08-28:daily-001-remediated-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions-src/2026-08-28-compound-growth-kaal-growth-2026-08-28-daily-001-remediated-v1.json",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-28-005",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-08-28-005.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:candidate:def0fb5b7ce20173f73bdd86d17716a0de8f772dc888857f3131947c6dfc93b2",
 "evidenceLevel": "permitted_full_text",
 "reviewTier": "independent evidence-first compound-growth review",
 "mappingConfidence": null,
 "mappingAmbiguous": false,
 "mappingMethod": "independent one-to-one proposition and mechanism review",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Mui and coauthors formally index reputation by context and identify vectorization as a cross-context design direction. They do not study silent transfer, measure implementation prevalence, or attribute context collapse to display convenience.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "canonicalUrl": "https://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/lmui/papers.html",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-28T14:01:34Z",
  "sourceContentSha256": "3a475c2ddafed087eaf860f1fa692e9d801f25f2d6b11d3501341177da8df8d3",
  "sourceProposition": "Mui, Mohtashemi, and Halberstadt model reputation and encounter history within a specific context, so the same actor's reputation estimate is conditioned on the context of the interaction.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "abbecfab85abaa26726cc027b3cacc8a9276accdfb1dc3c621a126caf74ce845",
  "normalizedWorkId": "doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.994181",
  "sourceVersion": "authors-postscript-2002",
  "exactEvidenceQuote": "Let C be the set of all contexts of interest. Let theta ji of c represent an agent's reputation in an embedded social network for the context c. Although context is explicitly modeled, cross-context estimation is not addressed. A simple scheme is to create vectorized versions of the quantities studied in this paper.",
  "exactEvidenceQuoteSha256": "b8bfc3105f059ccf6edd204f7745681ffd432b21c50449a0375cfc56db3b8cc5",
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:7314479-045",
    "confidence": null,
    "method": "independent one-to-one review",
    "whyRelevant": "Mui and coauthors formally index reputation by context and identify vectorization as a cross-context design direction. They do not study silent transfer, measure implementation prevalence, or attribute context collapse to display convenience.",
    "ambiguous": false
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Standing scholarly-growth preauthorization bound to 43b5726c8369904d8596ab3b06b7be37290a6b29fc158dcbb757e38b98e8e5ec; publication remains conditional on successful projection, deployment, and live-byte verification.",
 "publicIdentitySha256": "def0fb5b7ce20173f73bdd86d17716a0de8f772dc888857f3131947c6dfc93b2",
 "sha256": "28962340d65df84818ae4813b8f389d57e6ceb4491c49cdf9599a1694ec0761f"
}