{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-10-13-009",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-10-13-009",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Constitutional Amendment Becomes Dynamic Regulation",
 "text": "The protected claim establishes the pacing problem as a two sided divergence: innovation driven by science and technology is accelerating at the same time that federal and state agencies' regulatory processes have slowed down and continue to slow down. Kaal's position reads the amendment clause as the Enlightenment's answer to the same divergence at an earlier speed, with revision moving at the pace of conventions and ratifications. The essay's prescription, that the amendment function be rebuilt as dynamic regulation with feedback and anticipation embedded in rulemaking, is the essay's proposal and not a result of the protected claim.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-10-13",
 "dateModified": "2026-10-13",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "dynamic-regulation",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "innovation"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The protected claim establishes the two-sided divergence between accelerating innovation and slowing agency process. The position proposes a response to it.",
  "The comparison with constitutional amendment concerns the function of revision under uncertainty, not the legal status of any rule.",
  "Dynamic regulation as described is a proposal and has not been adopted by any regulator. The protected claim establishes the divergence, not the remedy."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Henry A. Kissinger, How the Enlightenment Ends (The Atlantic, June 2018)",
  "url": "https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2831040-001",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-001",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2016",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-001"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Henry A. Kissinger, How the Enlightenment Ends (The Atlantic, June 2018)",
   "url": "https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaalvis:2026-10-13:next-enlightenment-essay-nine-v1",
 "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.com/2026/10/13/the-next-enlightenment-is-institutional/",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-10-13-009",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-10-13-009.md",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "name": "The Next Enlightenment Is Institutional",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://wulfkaal.com/2026/10/13/the-next-enlightenment-is-institutional/",
  "sourceContentSha256": "24d1c0e70c0757e45c19da5c6d8333e7ba906596d83c47968eee50a3114846b9",
  "sourcePassage": "Dynamic regulation embeds feedback and anticipation into rulemaking so that institutions learn continuously instead of lurching from crisis to overcorrection to relaxation.",
  "sourcePassageSha256": "772bb94ca97fe8dbac853d9dbbca18994c2ce7acd64faf2faa600ed91ae5ea36"
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Wulf A. Kaal directed on 2026-10-13 that the essay The Next Enlightenment Is Institutional be added to the essays and positions layers. Each position states an argument Kaal published in that essay under his own name at the canonical URL recorded in source provenance.",
 "sha256": "f01228b8011cc9a7ce635c65a2c89d5ac2b31430a2aae5196abce867bc7a8dc6"
}