TrustCarry Protocol v0.3 — Research Claim 070
Projection profiles should be openly published and selected locally by relying parties because a specification body that controls both evidence schema and canonical scoring holds unrecorded allocative power.
Author-affirmed proposition from an unpublished research draft. Not part of the 5,033 published-source scholarly claim layer.
Holds when
Supporting passage
Governance of the projection profile deserves separate treatment because it is the locus of capture. A specification body that controls both the evidence schema and the canonical scoring rule holds allocative power that no authority grant records. The failure pattern is well documented: recentralization is the central obstacle to decentralized governance of AI systems (Kaal 2024a, claim 4796714-012), and consensus mechanisms that weight power by holdings "centralize control based on the quantity of tokens held, potentially skewing governance in favor of the wealthy" (Kaal 2024a, claim 4796714-014). Persona Protocol therefore treats profile publication as open and profile selection as local to the relying party.
Provenance
License
Verify