{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "CollectionPage",
  "name": "TrustCarry Protocol v0.3 Author-Affirmed Research Claims",
  "alternateName": "Persona Protocol v0.3 Author-Affirmed Research Claims",
  "author": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "description": "Public, author-affirmed research propositions distilled from an unpublished draft. Distinct from the 5,033 published-source scholarly claims.",
  "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/",
  "version": "0.3",
  "datePublished": "2026-08-01",
  "count": 77,
  "source_sha256": "38efc43b80ab62426ca1f946114677afeda730bca30dda71dfd299223a6def7c",
  "batch_sha256": "ff768f79b7be01f043039a09bd4cc3e1863b39e08d147ff076b8165fe7387b6c",
  "batch_id": "persona-protocol-v0.3-new-claims-2026-08-01",
  "scholarly_claim_layer_eligible": false,
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:001",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/001",
      "claim": "Continuity, competence, trust, and authority are separate institutional questions that require distinct protocol objects, decision owners, and failure rules.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "8dd88eb96594467fab9fefa83a0ffbcd29c58a312d7f39875fbc60844ee7e83a"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:002",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/002",
      "claim": "Reputation continuity is a transaction-cost, credible-commitment, and monitoring problem before it is an engineering problem.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "e6b2bd5ea55744a1e9cf715afc8196e0f67abff59bc477941421841823994d1e"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:003",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/003",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol represents reputation as a contextual projection over provenance-bearing evidence, preserves adverse lifecycle states, permits selective principal disclosure, and treats authority as an explicit, scoped, revocable grant that fails closed.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "45dcdcf8d7ebd15b790ce93fdd8007574f8baed7e3aa5b13936b3cc824fe4839"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:004",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/004",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol proposes a minimum separation of trust functions for autonomous actors that may be persistent without public identification, competent without authorization, and trusted for one decision without being trusted for all decisions.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "7bd393ec2c23da9b7a824ced3d0e5241e3dc4966b3755421b79bdf68ad721383"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:005",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/005",
      "claim": "Continuity, competence, trust, and authority are four institutional determinations with four different owners, not four formulations of one identity question.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "ba020a9769e7960f93681a0616349e7635a0297237916716e715f502f03b2e84"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:006",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/006",
      "claim": "An identifier-key binding does not determine legitimate reputation inheritance, a credential does not determine cross-domain weight, a reputation score does not create present authority, and an authority grant does not establish competence.",
      "claim_type": "failure",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "bb7fc4d52ae26878241318272e2fd6d1538dff40cef3d590a176b858e48b4fda"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:007",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/007",
      "claim": "Collapsing identity, reputation, trust, and authority into one score or token hides institutional judgment inside a scoring rule and ownership record rather than eliminating it.",
      "claim_type": "failure",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "a54a5e4bd77bdca6c41a3741cb34903f3e7e87a792a4552b093c544a7b0084fa"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:008",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/008",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol is a continuity and evidence architecture, not a universal identity system, final reputation algorithm, or authority provider.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "aceb121b7831ed186e6c740db9308c556b64cda474aafd2ce4d22c737b97dcbb"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:009",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/009",
      "claim": "Portable trust continuity is legitimate only when every contribution traces to evidence, validation, governance, context, challenge state, and time.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "717e18f6226feb64df14bd96f2865e61b421e16f4d36105cd323476010295bc8"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:010",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/010",
      "claim": "Cross-organizational autonomous-agent transactions face screening, verification, and credible-commitment costs that can force counterparties to absorb risk, reject external agents, or require human guarantors.",
      "claim_type": "mechanism",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "38b4410d11fadc9edeee7d6c0f030c0f31f42f83a145e37a52f0128a1a871402"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:011",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/011",
      "claim": "A reputation history can substitute for a bond only if it attaches to a subject that cannot costlessly shed it, is interpretable in the present domain, and is contestable and inspectable.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "cb98eec57a2b4d5b640f68e1a51996f5980bb703bc69b56d627f6bac864bfbcc"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:012",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/012",
      "claim": "The institutional deficit in agent trust concerns the governed objects that signatures carry, not the availability of cryptographic signatures themselves.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "c73682dc676f24b144c4e612450702bffeeff51c99a4d855b088fd40f976616c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:013",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/013",
      "claim": "Eliminating psychological guile does not eliminate objective misalignment: a faithfully optimizing agent can impose counterparty losses without deception, and verifiability alone does not determine whether to transact.",
      "claim_type": "mechanism",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "acf2be808490c88ac6ce10b40a49d5c159b7edf83e2f59f65fac988dfb2281a4"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:014",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/014",
      "claim": "When generative output is abundant but validation capacity remains scarce, allocating validation attention across abundant claimants becomes more important rather than less.",
      "claim_type": "mechanism",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "aa51d4a01b8e6103a476c2cc01a739c4a791c3792c8cbd318301fb34af943f72"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:015",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/015",
      "claim": "Control of a current key does not establish the truth of a signed claim, supply a legitimate reputation function, or determine whether a material system change preserves the accountable subject.",
      "claim_type": "failure",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "3e44ee24176a12f3c4e0e33dda29c2f0d075cb0ea2152abe8df158338f524b94"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:016",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/016",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol composes with identity and credential standards but adds the distinct object of governed continuity for a reputation-bearing history.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "a3729a8bef552edcb7e7a875f1c33288345b24abf932d25fc26b29b3483770d8"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:017",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/017",
      "claim": "Reputation should be represented as an evidence set, expertise graph, validation record, and purpose-bound projection rather than as a universal score.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "fbf7614fdf1c708b11af9f13f56272b65b910545dd7dff315c76e93d1b764c08"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:018",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/018",
      "claim": "Trust may inform risk, but only an authorized issuer can create authority; reputation may satisfy a grant condition but cannot substitute for or enlarge the grant.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "60c6b1bcbe198c7dbada397b3be9419512ec63395e71ec2a948c586a59bd673a"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:019",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/019",
      "claim": "A system that converts reputation directly into authority gives the author of the projection rule control over the action allocation.",
      "claim_type": "failure",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "6c7b002d983480e4d0186e52b9aeb1dfbe68f1cbe4ceae01d8a6a46f924dea88"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:020",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/020",
      "claim": "Operational telemetry can become evidence, but task counts, uptime, registrations, messages, executions, and state transitions are not reputation merely because they exist.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "4c8d9fbb3e497c4dd297bc040e417864a3447b03a5955296465f801a526df550"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:021",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/021",
      "claim": "Externally eligible reputation requires an intervening governed admission decision recorded in an evidence event that identifies artifact, context, mode, taxonomy, validator set, governance rule, outcome, time, and content commitment.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "e722365f236a5d4ef38a0925c07d8e90aa654e9f6d5df0b3ad2d308541ec4b06"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:022",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/022",
      "claim": "Synthetic fixtures, operator canaries, directory listings, and repeated raw observations do not become externally eligible reputation without governed validation.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "39bc743223bb4e59b1d631385b5a30a4d3f19c1b97f21e5fc7f74ecfa4adc4f8"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:023",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/023",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol does not eliminate Sybil corruption; its narrower claim is to make the cost of corruption legible.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "ef21e61a566481aa5e970e179b5002e25065c037cb262f0f8e210ae14c7f0900"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:024",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/024",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol versions and publishes projection profiles and permits competing profiles over a shared evidence commitment so that scoring rules remain revisable.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "f0efa669fcbb2ae8a5d6c1143cb41461931537cb4118b052017162df05709cd1"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:025",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/025",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol supplies portability and continuity but does not itself supply calibrated slashing, robust Sybil resistance, or maintained human oversight.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "65b2ace3f6725c443e3a9ae20558ac7fec93e345f0808df11f01f043ef94a6f0"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:026",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/026",
      "claim": "A Persona is a persistent protocol subject that accumulates a continuity-bound evidence history and need not correspond to a human, model, runtime, wallet, organization, or public principal.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "0e45a2cdeee649b0515f9f91aaf77aaaff88af86950f903b27a632bc16fb9d17"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:027",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/027",
      "claim": "A Persona may survive governed rotation, migration, recovery, or declared upgrades, but material changes must produce a continuity event, fork, or new Persona, and principal disclosure remains policy-dependent.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "6447872f29ffb46646a2b60b32f45a81e67d002d79c236df6e689097ab90fdd8"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:028",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/028",
      "claim": "Persona evaluation uses four sequential, fail-closed gates, and a later gate cannot satisfy an earlier gate.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "127efab5c8f2ed351353330ec72c0cee0fee70dcf8eb3e07fe955c6e2559a73e"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:029",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/029",
      "claim": "An unverifiable continuity link terminates reputation inheritance at that point, so evidence earned before the unverifiable transition does not transfer forward.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "0aebe23e8838fc7f689871eb2b066ff06445ff96d2cb5de4eb93c7cf7b5ae11d"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:030",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/030",
      "claim": "Evidence sufficiency is evaluated within the relevant domain, mode, and time window, and coverage must be read before any aggregate.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "4899493612b12cc5e3fc430f12e5c0dfe9259fc71eb1545f6b3919672243510e"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:031",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/031",
      "claim": "A contextual projection and its uncertainty are inputs to a risk decision, not the decision itself.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "7218f62da4467e07364e54f281ba49d1187257271fc002dec0c8cf98d600c660"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:032",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/032",
      "claim": "Authority must be verified independently of continuity, evidence sufficiency, and trust projection, with denial unless every required grant element verifies.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "d0fc94c07e64f7b3293fd732c1b562a066f56a7a402b933fa5cd23d792439163"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:033",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/033",
      "claim": "Evidence events are immutable, signed, content-addressed, and append-only; corrections supersede rather than erase, and adverse lifecycle states remain in history.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "4031b0a1f7d4dfdacf2ec60b865f919046cb48f46525043eeca5793baddfef89"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:034",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/034",
      "claim": "Validator independence must be demonstrated through disclosed operators, datasets, incentives, and governance structures rather than inferred from distinct validator names.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "e58f31a6b1727196f43d105c6c55e73be50a9ca5ec809bd80fe61958b9613fcb"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:035",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/035",
      "claim": "Projection profiles must disclose whether consensus strength affects evidence weight and may use loosely coupled admission for contested categories to avoid suppressing minority evaluation.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "e5309f2fc25efe9666819c2d39b5d941127d930c74ef89add77e182d8cb7b4d7"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:036",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/036",
      "claim": "The founding validator assumption must be recorded with its governance basis so relying parties can discount the subtree that descends from it.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "12289f2fd63d7e09e925ecb1096b845d426c087bd679d6bde7ca9913ede5acef"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:037",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/037",
      "claim": "Multiple admission systems may export a common minimum receipt while retaining their local rules.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "0dc13d065462632a5f72c5086e67d513ecd31007d4dbe82999382ddb6ade7a04"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:038",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/038",
      "claim": "Expertise is represented through a versioned directed graph in which historical evidence retains its original tag and taxonomy version, and later mappings cannot rewrite source events.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "5a3079d57449678caebfd5ae1e44cf6020da925fc04211cc3b5b47618b264c43"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:039",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/039",
      "claim": "Graph adjacency does not prove competence transfer, local stages do not create universal rank, and cross-system comparison requires a declared, fallible crosswalk.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "e69e95c93369daec65e48702ca26b162ac2ed255c114a42d6927a6ab25377121"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:040",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/040",
      "claim": "A derivation edge is evidence about both contributing Personas, and its dispute path must be declared in advance.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "47a92827fa29c699200e9b4b227b314af3f16efde73170e8c879807f663e38f0"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:041",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/041",
      "claim": "Agent Reputation Identity is a versioned contextual projection over a committed evidence set, not a universal identity.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "c59f1cbfbe68e4527d30e29af00cabbfce9fbf88c70bd75c76de842c06e4891c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:042",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/042",
      "claim": "A conforming projection discloses its filters, taxonomy mapping, validator and outcome treatment, decay, uncertainty, weights, aggregation, eligibility, rounding, expertise vector, and coverage.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "45a622c1bcf8ce478c1882e3742ce22a4f441b4e12920b14a40cefe40471c68c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:043",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/043",
      "claim": "Evidence commitments should be portable across competing projection profiles because a single canonical scoring rule gives its controller unrecorded allocative authority.",
      "claim_type": "failure",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "02f5fe7f622bffa966cb4ae501a02e0480e082d9507b1821df6c5ca397d02d24"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:044",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/044",
      "claim": "Projection-profile authorship belongs with the evaluated domain rather than with a central specification body.",
      "claim_type": "normative",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "02fb8afb4a9bf3bd8a70214d042491a3789245b400d40d3aa96c102e5158b760"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:045",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/045",
      "claim": "The reference projection formula is an uncalibrated engineering demonstration and must not be treated as a validated production measure.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "bbdcf8d70a7721f313f9100c4c3ebe43ad4ff7df7c5b2200896254b1895aa70c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:046",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/046",
      "claim": "Missing evidence is null rather than zero; below a declared domain coverage threshold, a projection reports coverage and uncertainty without an aggregate.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "24be794e4a8e17fb2ab3b8722d21c65a80dc25f4e3cdccd6192ba64e7a9be4fb"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:047",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/047",
      "claim": "Governed continuity and explicit coverage relocate the newcomer penalty into a legible, domain-scoped cost that can be discharged through evidence, but they do not abolish entry cost.",
      "claim_type": "mechanism",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "18c81014e310321d6bfc9f936e4afcb346075c99d8bdcfdfeeae35be6a2ae939"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:048",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/048",
      "claim": "Every continuity event links to its predecessor and identifies the governance policy in force before the transition.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "6123d2ddc5ea3a92503ca4aa55922fa7852a3452de6969a22303196c19d3354c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:049",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/049",
      "claim": "Key transfer alone does not transfer reputation; forks require allocation rules, mergers cannot silently sum scores, and recovery cannot erase a compromised interval.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "a2564d0ccf8fa1732e5e4b2dd470be715b65228fe37120c0074f2910e9981b2d"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:050",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/050",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol cannot prevent out-of-band control sales, but observable changes in keys, verification methods, or governing principals must produce continuity events that relying parties can use to discount inherited evidence.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "08b29207e0bf27cd1f3f42db572611472321d1edc24a8fc66b3280c8c5fcc009"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:051",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/051",
      "claim": "Trust relationships require typed, directed, scoped, sourced, and time-bounded edges because scalar representations destroy relationship information.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "9f28ea67b2a2a338d6bac1cb53a060738f562e8f7690ee40af031a998483db34"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:052",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/052",
      "claim": "Validation, collaboration, membership, recognition, and authority are distinct relations, and circular graph paths do not establish independent support.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "a56737c4029533113bc8318cc18509682f253a8eeb0b1131019518d821609699"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:053",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/053",
      "claim": "Trust-graph algorithms must disclose path rules, cycle treatment, correlation assumptions, and centrality effects because a trust graph is a provenance structure before it is a scoring structure.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "3fecd92a67eba57cc62e9ff494ac7b169eb9fc3e002403b21b5c95d27bd2cf50"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:054",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/054",
      "claim": "Authority grants must identify issuer, subject, action, resource, constraints, time, delegation depth, revocation, policy, and proof; child grants may preserve or narrow but never enlarge scope.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "c27066f225f03d20a175bd56deb80bd35157fac7f584185f42d74fa775281921"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:055",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/055",
      "claim": "Authority evaluation denies by default when required grant elements cannot be verified, and a reputation projection may be a grant condition but cannot become the grant.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "1f835c22be2f679b62c38171d4649dc6088eb03c9570343b657b188b5b5b0e00"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:056",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/056",
      "claim": "Public Persona data should be minimal, with principal identity, raw artifacts, model internals, customer data, validator deliberations, recovery contacts, and protected attributes restricted by default.",
      "claim_type": "normative",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "10954e737eceb3d2a4776627ffe24d64118e2e7185a31ad89647758c9d883891"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:057",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/057",
      "claim": "A Persona record should be owned by its subject rather than its host, while append-only integrity should be reconciled with privacy through tombstones, encryption, restricted stores, and selective disclosure.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "8192646c004c84c5f313bd07555156326621f1f2f49de436076c496264609b63"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:058",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/058",
      "claim": "Continuity reduces whitewashing while creating persistent linkage risk, so the protocol manages rather than resolves the tension between accountability and privacy.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "530f1a6870c42b5e1617f9dbd0fa38dd01ae6c6cd5e3c9d553cc1c2f6a133dca"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:059",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/059",
      "claim": "Integration with MCP, A2A, credentials, attestations, and authority tokens does not change their evidentiary meaning: discovery is not competence, attestation is bounded by appraisal policy, credentials remain issuer claims, and authority remains issuer- and scope-bounded.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "cd3690a6b53d0d115050b1e38d45b3f1da4e00761bd14f09f4fe6bf7bb51727c"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:060",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/060",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol makes the reputation-bearing subject non-transferable by default and requires declared, visible continuity events for transitions, allowing relying parties to discount pre-transition evidence.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "dc9a90a62f4181db905fe198963d4f7c625431224679faf6d6a2d404c81cc981"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:061",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/061",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol offers a provisional constructive separation of functions that adjacent standards can implement, transport, or reference, without asserting a completed novelty review.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "ace96ce12d6f1ebb39eae64ed07e983420709e50df52e5036944ec78dbd6e591"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:062",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/062",
      "claim": "Passing the reference implementation's synthetic tests does not establish external validation, security, production readiness, calibrated projections, or independent interoperability.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "206eee7e3c8cafa2752f02e9de38fbc9cab478eda131c440d2b5ac7919d61736"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:063",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/063",
      "claim": "The separation thesis is falsified if deployed systems routinely collapse the four gates into one score without reducing decision quality.",
      "claim_type": "predictive",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "b6a9c5c87a15ff44230076bd7c4c3b5ca2069393bd66ece76595d7f146915af9"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:064",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/064",
      "claim": "The non-transferability thesis is falsified if governed transfer with full disclosure produces the same downstream error rates as non-transferability.",
      "claim_type": "predictive",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "c45b700ae37d3ad94e30a3edcc7db76a65a5a060bb9af4d67cecd7ad31bfe840"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:065",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/065",
      "claim": "The coverage thesis is falsified if suppressing aggregates below a coverage threshold produces worse relying-party outcomes than reporting a baseline.",
      "claim_type": "predictive",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "5e414df59bd7a90c83b3fe4c44ee0587ab59e24a0611f14c5a81f47e2723949f"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:066",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/066",
      "claim": "The competing-profiles thesis is falsified if plural profiles over a shared evidence commitment converge to a de facto canonical rule in ordinary use.",
      "claim_type": "predictive",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "9027926ebd7d16d3490c900951e802fd9e6d7c20f014363863e1982bde08ae17"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:067",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/067",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol supplies an auditability condition for reputation governance but does not supply the metric-quality condition required for reliable outcomes.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "9ca7d467eecf0844548daf05506b88c2ac84095b5820a0c14ece67b84bbcb4aa"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:068",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/068",
      "claim": "Protocol governance must separate specification stewardship, evidence adjudication, and local authority; changes require documented analysis, and emergency powers must be narrow, temporary, logged, and reviewed.",
      "claim_type": "design",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "cc7b87309f8307d50519a3844ec0929c4fd47f75f933961a64597e3c739982d8"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:069",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/069",
      "claim": "A stable protocol release requires an open conformance suite and at least two independent interoperable implementations; no vendor implementation is itself the standard.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "6adbf7a9ff54b24bf7809cc9d7d3c8d7a41255967c1a3d323cfe567a7c0d70af"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:070",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/070",
      "claim": "Projection profiles should be openly published and selected locally by relying parties because a specification body that controls both evidence schema and canonical scoring holds unrecorded allocative power.",
      "claim_type": "normative",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "c9af6db9dec20f1d01fde2608e522dec4c69cb78857ecb3d3f8e916071dcabaa"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:071",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/071",
      "claim": "Reputation governance must be revisable on the timescale of exploitation and able to ingest evidence of its own gaming.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "194acafdb7c6b8bd401e19ad157279d2aa4416c2fb936d687c894b7a6b57e700"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:072",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/072",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol's principal threat model includes seizure, whitewashing, reputation purchase, synthetic-evidence laundering, collusion, bootstrap capture, replay, graph rings, taxonomy gaming, projection manipulation, authority escalation, deanonymization, stale projections, and governance capture.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "092f4a828eca2aa90340cf8f369eb49d22ac8015e85793bb502c1b512c89058a"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:073",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/073",
      "claim": "Persona Protocol does not claim to solve its threat model; implementations must identify the control, residual risk, and decision boundary for each threat.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "1cc40f925b51e044d6eb5fc01d457add2e6703e527e95d6b229b28d8ecb50e24"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:074",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/074",
      "claim": "The Trust Capital hypothesis predicts that sustained, independently validated, portable reputation may reduce transactional uncertainty and lower contracting costs across organizational boundaries.",
      "claim_type": "predictive",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "095eb2eafb76a2b1b1c67de25a85d03570d238674e3f6c885324ee45e75d97cc"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:075",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/075",
      "claim": "Trust Capital is capital in an institutional sense rather than a balance-sheet sense.",
      "claim_type": "definitional",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "5c3879fd9806f77bc497b4627c8d9d98fa9501262e58e462e3e658ddf3e54136"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:076",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/076",
      "claim": "Testing Trust Capital requires causal evidence linking defined reputation histories to transaction terms, collateral, loss, selection, or authority decisions; until then it remains a hypothesis rather than an asset or price.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "8ef17d78f41562b093348ef473fe36aad31fc2d3903abbfc51bd2d60fd2ef25a"
    },
    {
      "id": "kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:077",
      "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/research-claims/trustcarry-protocol/v0.3/077",
      "claim": "A protocol can preserve evidence of a reputation decision but cannot by itself supply the decision's lawfulness or legitimacy.",
      "claim_type": "condition",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "Persona Protocol v0.3 as proposed; not an adopted standard"
      ],
      "sha256": "5e55c22d031ed1e9fdfbb267fa40f773f54efddaba911547617c8d0f8de90af7"
    }
  ]
}