kaal:claim:1558614-006

Although the business judgment rule is articulated differently in the two countries and German law leaves somewhat more room to challenge risky decisions, in both the United States and Germany the rule is highly protective of corporate managers.

A later claim in the corpus revises this one. Prefer quoting kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-011.
Source quote, verbatim
the business judgment rule is articulated differently in the United States and in Germany, and there may be more latitude to challenge some risky decisions in Germany, but in both countries the rule is highly protective of corporate managers
From

Painter and Kaal, Initial Reflections on an Evolving Standard Constraints on Risk Taking by Directors and Officers in (2010), I.B. The Issues Confronting the United States and Germany, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1558614 · source PDF

Cite as

Painter and Kaal, Initial Reflections on an Evolving Standard Constraints on Risk Taking by Directors and Officers in (2010). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1558614

Classification

empiricalsupport: arguedcorporate-governancelaw-and-legal-systems

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e898211630f4116879329d6de8397523dca5b066864147421aa5cbc7429dc83b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/3339ee630fa3a437...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1558614-006.md | sha256sum