kaal:claim:1765901-015

Given the defects of a party location analysis, courts should de-emphasize where the parties are and instead use a totality of the circumstances approach to determine where a privately negotiated derivative transaction took place.

Source quote, verbatim
perhaps de-emphasizing the location of the parties while focusing on the totality of the circumstances could help establish appropriate parameters to determine where a privately negotiated derivative transaction took place.
From

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 3. When Does a Private Transaction Take Place in the U.S.?, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Cite as

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

Holds when
Classification

designsupport: arguedinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e0b1ca92c827e09a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-015.md | sha256sum