kaal:claim:1765901-018

For exchange traded securities, the location of the exchange rather than the location of the plaintiff's broker should be the controlling factor under Morrison, although it is uncertain whether all courts will adopt this bright line test.

location of the exchange, not the location of the plaintiff's broker, should be the controlling factor, but it remains to be seen whether this bright line test will in fact be the rule adopted by all courts.

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 4. Does a Transaction Take Place in the U.S. if a U.S. Broker Is Involved?, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• exchange traded securities
• claims analyzed under Morrison

designsupport: argueddefi

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/dddd590d4dc981d1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-018.md | sha256sum