kaal:claim:1765901-021

Unless courts can construe Morrison for swap agreements and other derivatives consistently with both the logic and the language of the opinion, Congress will have to enact new clarifying legislation.

Unless courts can clearly construe Morrison in the context of swap agreements and other derivative securities, in a manner that is consistent with the logic as well as the language of the Court's opinion, Congress will have to enact new legislation that clarifies this issue.

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 2. Does Section 10(b) Apply to Derivative Transactions in the U.S. that Are Based on Foreign Traded Stocks?, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• derivative transactions with extraterritorial components

conditionsupport: arguedinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/11bc99bcedcef69c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-021.md | sha256sum