kaal:claim:1765901-022

The Second Circuit should uphold Judge Baer's ruling on a totality of the circumstances basis and explain more fully how those circumstances determine the location of a swap agreement under Morrison.

The Second Circuit should uphold Judge Baer's ruling based on the totality of the circumstances and also explain more completely how these circumstances should be evaluated for the purpose of determining the location of a swap agreement under Morrison.

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 2. Does Section 10(b) Apply to Derivative Transactions in the U.S. that Are Based on Foreign Traded Stocks?, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• appeal of the Porsche dismissal

designsupport: assertedinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/d430022c130bdae1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-022.md | sha256sum