kaal:claim:1806252-007

Hedge fund managers subjected to stricter rules in one jurisdiction while competing with funds in less restrictive jurisdictions could be placed at a comparative disadvantage.

Source quote, verbatim

If hedge fund managers are subjected to stricter rules in one jurisdiction while competing for clients and profit margins with funds in jurisdictions that impose less restrictive rules, they could be at a comparative disadvantage.

From

Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III (2011), III.3 Impact Assessment of Asymmetric Regulation in Dodd-Frank and the AIFM Directive, p. 50
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1806252 · source PDF

Cite as

Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1806252

Holds when

managers compete for the same clients and profit margins across jurisdictions

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedregulatory-failureprivate-funds

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3343ebfe05a925c3d1a75625c4b351ccff515c50819a48d155804daacf01429d. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c62a29ae6e123d3b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-007.md | sha256sum