kaal:claim:2029983-021

The Dutch unfair trade practice and misrepresentation provisions invoked in Fortis, taken together, approximate the legal protections available in the United States under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, which makes the Dutch legal system a possible avenue for circumventing the restrictions imposed by Morrison.

Source quote, verbatim

Combined, these sections approximate legal protections available in the United States under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Given the comparability, the Dutch legal system could present a possible avenue for circumventing the restrictions imposed by the Morrison decision.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012), II.B.2.a. Fortis, p. 44
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

Holds when

claims brought under Dutch civil law and the Dutch Financial Supervision Act

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/ee440f4dee5b5529...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-021.md | sha256sum