kaal:claim:2029983-029

The WCAM's structural limits could reduce the number of successful settlements: while the largest cases such as Shell and Fortis give plaintiffs enough leverage to force large settlements, smaller cases may not be successfully settled in Dutch courts.

Source quote, verbatim

While the largest cases, such as Shell and Fortis, would probably still provide sufficient lev- erage for the plaintiffs to result in large settlements with de- fendants, smaller cases may not be successfully settled in Dutch courts.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012), II.B.4. Countervailing Factors, p. 54
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

Holds when

smaller claims with limited settlement leverage

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: small-case-settlement-gapfamily: investor-protection-gapinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/738db3b85b4f406e...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-029.md | sha256sum