kaal:claim:2061166-008

The authors identify a drafting defect in the proposed CRD IV Regulation: the distinction drawn by financial institution in Article 51(a) is ambiguous and the cross reference to the institution referred to in point (a) of Article 87 is unclear and indeterminate, so the provision requires clarification or amendment.

the distinction is ambiguous and requires further clarification or amendment. Specifically, the statutory reference in § 51, ¶ (a) ("of the institution referred to in point (a) of Article 87") is unclear and indeterminate.

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012), 3. Revisions of the Capital Requirements Directives, p. 27
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166 · source PDF

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166

• Article 51 of the proposed CRD IV Regulation as drafted

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Indeterminate statutory cross reference in Article 51family: definitional-ambiguitycontingent-capitallaw-and-legal-systems

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5be48c213bb4c341...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-008.md | sha256sum