kaal:claim:2061166-033

Dual trigger proposals draw their central strength from reliance on market prices, but the index leg is a major disadvantage because it can create incentives to manipulate the index or to force an entity into bankruptcy before conversion occurs.

Source quote, verbatim
A central strength of the dual trigger proposals is their reliance on market prices. A major disadvantage is the index trigger, which could potentially create incentives to manipulate the index or to try to force an entity into bankruptcy.
From

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012), C. Dual Triggers in Going and Gone Concern, p. 67
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166 · source PDF

Cite as

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Index trigger invites manipulation and forced bankruptcyfamily: trigger-design-failurecontingent-capitaleconomics

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/15dca352c47abb61...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-033.md | sha256sum