kaal:claim:2061166-034

A second, sequential trigger placed before reorganization or resolution cushions the risk that policy makers misstructure the first trigger, absorbing the negative effects of inadequate or untimely conversion at the moment the institution needs capital.

Source quote, verbatim
Given the risk that policy makers may not structure the trigger appropriately, the negative effects of inadequate or untimely conversion of debt into equity at a time when the company requires a capital injection could be cushioned with a second trigger
From

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012), C. Dual Triggers in Going and Gone Concern, p. 68
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166 · source PDF

Cite as

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166

Holds when
Classification

designsupport: arguedcontingent-capitalsystemic-riskgovernance-design

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/16f4222a4e4bcdc6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-034.md | sha256sum