kaal:claim:2150377-030

The incidence of Dodd-Frank compliance cost falls on the management company rather than the fund: the responses indicate that the management company bears the brunt of registration and disclosure costs, and whether and how those expenses will be passed to investors over time is unclear.

In the pool of respondents for this study, the responses seem to indicate that it is the management company that bears the brunt of costs associated with the registration and disclosure requirements. It is unclear whether and how the increased expenses will be passed on to investors over time.

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012), F. Investment Management Company
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377

• the pool of respondents in this study
• short run, within months of the registration effective date

mechanismsupport: arguedcomplianceempirical-evidence

• supported_by kaal:claim:2732915-035 Of those who responded, 75.4 percent indicated that the profits of their investment management company were af...
• supported_by kaal:claim:2816408-010 Private fund managers themselves distinguish costs from returns: a majority of surveyed managers opined that D...
• supported_by kaal:claim:2739479-036 By 2015 a clear majority of respondents, 93 percent, attributed effects on their investment management company...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0b58bb409cac7674d78515f5374096f9a349de3bbd1983c990e0edc85a635a09. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/cd993014305a95be...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2150377-030.md | sha256sum