kaal:claim:2267560-020
In the conventional NIE learning process, the requirements for rules and their adaptability to future states become clear only after stable and presumptively optimal rules have already emerged as suboptimal, so anticipation of future developments plays no role and learning is confined to learning from mistakes.
Source quote, verbatim
Anticipation of future developments does not play a role in this learning process.
From
Cite as
Holds when
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: retrospective-only learning in rulemakingfamily: rule-obsolescence-and-ossificationdynamic-regulation
Related claims
Verify
Positions extending this scholarly claim