The SEC's failure to interpret Section 402 of Sarbanes-Oxley, while not a formal retraction, shows that Section 402 is another instance of politically motivated rulemaking that later has to be scaled back.
Source quote, verbatim
While not a formal retraction, the SEC's lack of interpretation underscores that section 402 provides another instance of politically motivated rulemaking that later has to be scaled back.
Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857
Holds when
rules enacted under post-crisis political pressure
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: informal retraction of politically motivated rulesfamily: enforcement-gapdynamic-regulation
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/598498d0dadc6690...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-035.md | sha256sum