kaal:claim:2317580-025

Unlike private contracts, CIAs are not the product of genuine bargaining choice: companies execute them to avoid further prosecution and exclusion from Medicaid and Medicare, so that once the government decides a CIA is warranted, a company that wishes to remain in its industry has its hands tied.

Source quote, verbatim

If the government decides a CIA is warranted, the company's hands are tied if it wants to continue to operate within its industry.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013), IV. The Role of CIAs in Expanding Fiduciary Duties, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

Holds when

health care companies dependent on federal health care program participation

Classification

conditionsupport: arguedcompliance

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fbd6e447b9ffadc6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-025.md | sha256sum