kaal:claim:2389416-033

Difference-in-differences analysis confirms the regression discontinuity results, showing a positive and highly significant treatment coefficient for funds above the $150 million AUM threshold.

Source quote, verbatim

Our DiD analysis confirms the results of our RD design. Table 9 shows the dummy variable that identifies the treatment with a positive coefficient that is highly significant.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Hedge Fund Performance (2014), 5.3. Difference-in-Difference Design
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389416 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Hedge Fund Performance (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389416

Holds when

4290 observations
treatment defined as AUM above $150 million after March 2012

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedresearch-methods

Related claims

supported_by kaal:claim:2816408-016 The study identifies the causal effect of Title IV by treating the March 30, 2012 registration effective date ...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0e1c4615b104821577498d9655de43b9c5c3e985bb0215f56c038b8232be65c3. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/02d3333ca32ac042...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2389416-033.md | sha256sum