kaal:claim:2470008-034

Because the FSOC uses RAUM related valuations directly and indirectly to set stage one thresholds, and because RAUM requires substantial filer interpretation, it is questionable whether the FSOC can use that Form PF data effectively and sustainably for systemic risk evaluations and SIFI designations.

A later claim in the corpus revises this one. Prefer quoting kaal:claim:2998097-024.
Source quote, verbatim
it seems at least questionable if FSOC will be able to use the related Form PF data effectively and sustainably for its systemic risk evaluations and the designation of non-bank financial companies as systemically risky
From

Wulf A. Kaal, The Systemic Risk of Private Funds after the Dodd-Frank Act (2014), 2. Impact on Systemic Risk Assessment
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2470008 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, The Systemic Risk of Private Funds after the Dodd-Frank Act (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2470008

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Interpretation dependent RAUM drives thresholdsfamily: definitional-ambiguityprivate-fundssystemic-risk

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 5f68a401c935527d89658171e9b48a4d186710459aaf2bdbead755507394e8c9. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/526b693f8328153e...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2470008-034.md | sha256sum