kaal:claim:2629451-033

Because the market reacts positively both to N/DPA announcements and to the governance improvements taking effect, the DOJ's escalation of N/DPA executions beginning in 2002 could be justified on market value grounds.

Source quote, verbatim
The positive market reaction to announcements of N/DPAs and to N/DPA governance improvements at the beginning of the N/DPA term suggest that the DOJ's increase in N/DPA executions, starting in 2002, could be justified.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (2015), VI. Discussion, 2. Policy Implications, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629451 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (2015). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629451

Holds when
Classification

normativesupport: arguedcompliance

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 507404d641abb922ab6d8e3a0b032e35ead2befd7b88746d09d178a8fa816957. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/d4b539664cdcd86e...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2629451-033.md | sha256sum