kaal:claim:2715083-035

Amendments to Regulation SHO may deny mutual fund advisers certain hedging techniques, making it less likely that mutual funds can attract retail investors who are looking for alternative investment exposure.

Source quote, verbatim

Investment advisers to mutual funds may not be able to use certain hedging techniques after the amendment of Regulation SHO, making it less likely for investment advisers running mutual funds to attract retail investors who are seeking alternative investment opportunities.

From

Kaal, Confluence of Mutual and Private Funds (2016), V.3 Retail Alternative Fund Growth, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2715083 · source PDF

Cite as

Kaal, Confluence of Mutual and Private Funds (2016). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2715083

Holds when

stocks subject to significant downward price pressure under amended Regulation SHO

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Regulation SHO hedging constraintfamily: innovation-chillinginstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b5c92186260d4a8499a14f81ee24ace093b24e7740af3effcd1c526fa4fa221e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6cbddd9cd22d9455...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2715083-035.md | sha256sum