kaal:claim:2740477-007

Artificial intelligence cannot be held personally liable for damage it causes because national and international law do not currently recognize it as a subject of law, so compensation must be forced through existing provisions never designed for it.

However, national and international law do not (currently) recognize AI as a subject of law. Without legal personality, AI cannot be personally liable for damages.

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016), IV. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477

• current state of national and international law
• damage caused by autonomous AI

failuresupport: arguedfailure: AI liability gap from absent legal personalityfamily: legal-personality-and-liability-gapai-and-agentslaw-and-legal-systems

• restated_by kaal:claim:2834531-002 Because neither national nor international law recognizes artificial intelligence as a subject of law, AI has ...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2808132-009 Because artificial intelligence is not recognized as a subject of law in national or international law, it has...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f289b8df8a57826a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-007.md | sha256sum