kaal:claim:2740477-008
Disruptive innovative technology frequently does not fit the legal categories created by recalcitrant regulatory structures, so the classification problem itself is a source of regulatory failure.
Source quote, verbatim
Disruptive innovative technology often does not fit into existing legal categories created by recalcitrant regulatory structures.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016), IV. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: Category mismatch between technology and lawfamily: rule-obsolescence-and-ossificationlaw-and-legal-systemsinnovationsystemic-risk
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/94a40bf9569a35a3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-008.md | sha256sum