kaal:claim:2748096-028

The SIFI designation regime does not reach hedge funds in practice: because the asset threshold is set high, at $50 billion or more in aggregate total consolidated assets, hedge funds are unlikely to be designated as systemically important financial institutions.

Source quote, verbatim

However, hedge funds are unlikely to be designated as SIFIs because of the high threshold on AUM.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy A. Krause, Hedge Funds and Systemic Risk (2016), Financial Stability Oversight Council, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2748096 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy A. Krause, Hedge Funds and Systemic Risk (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2748096

Holds when

U.S. SIFI designation under the Dodd-Frank Act
$50 billion aggregate total consolidated asset threshold

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: SIFI threshold underinclusionfamily: enforcement-gapsystemic-risk

Related claims

extends kaal:claim:2470008-017 Commonly managed investment funds holding $50 billion or more in aggregate total consolidated assets can be de...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 8f30260f2c1db728b45c4f3b9b7c64358cf9d3217277bc3c63a910c32f87b508. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0489ac89d84f94f6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2748096-028.md | sha256sum