kaal:claim:2808132-014

Rulemakers' inability to address disruptive innovation will generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency that inhibit innovation during technological transition, and technological transition is likely to become a permanent state, so the inhibiting effect becomes permanent too.

disruptive innovation will likely generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency74 that inhibit innovation during technological transition periods; and technological transition is likely going to be a permanent state in the age of disruptive

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, p. 17
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• age of continuous disruptive innovation
• fragmented multi-agency regulatory structures

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Permanent transition uncertaintyfamily: innovation-chillinglaw-and-legal-systemsinnovation

• restated_by kaal:claim:2834531-009 Because technological transition is becoming a permanent state rather than an episode, rulemakers' inability t...
• extends kaal:claim:2740477-012 Rulemakers' inability to address the regulatory issues raised by disruptive innovation will generate high leve...
• restates kaal:claim:2740477-013 Technological transition will be a permanent state in the age of disruptive innovation, so the uncertainty and...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5f7f62008a0d2ff5...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-014.md | sha256sum