The ex post facts-based approach to rulemaking worked historically because the optimal requirements for rules only become clear once stable and presumptively optimal rules have already emerged as suboptimal; the availability of that information is therefore a prerequisite for rulemaking.
Source quote, verbatim
change. The ex-post facts-based approach to rulemaking has functioned in the existing regulatory framework because optimal requirements for rules do become clear when stable and presumptively optimal rules emerge as suboptimal. A prerequisite for
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.1 Ex Post Facts-Based (Trial-and-Error) Rulemaking, p. 18 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
Holds when
historically stable economic and market environments
rulemaking dependent on realized facts
Classification
conditionsupport: argueddynamic-regulation
Related claims
extendskaal:claim:2267560-020 In the conventional NIE learning process, the requirements for rules and their adaptability to future states b...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/418ab97d54b9f614...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-016.md | sha256sum