kaal:claim:2808132-016

The ex post facts-based approach to rulemaking worked historically because the optimal requirements for rules only become clear once stable and presumptively optimal rules have already emerged as suboptimal; the availability of that information is therefore a prerequisite for rulemaking.

Source quote, verbatim
change. The ex-post facts-based approach to rulemaking has functioned in the existing regulatory framework because optimal requirements for rules do become clear when stable and presumptively optimal rules emerge as suboptimal. A prerequisite for
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.1 Ex Post Facts-Based (Trial-and-Error) Rulemaking, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

Holds when
Classification

conditionsupport: argueddynamic-regulation

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/418ab97d54b9f614...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-016.md | sha256sum