kaal:claim:2808132-020

The historically evolved rulemaking infrastructure could cope with its own collective action problems, regulatory cycles, and trial-and-error rulemaking without major disruption because the scope of regulatory issues was limited and institutional designs were consensus driven.

issues.80 Because of the limited scope of regulatory issues and the need for consensus- driven institutional designs, the historically evolved infrastructure for rulemaking could cope with its inherent collective action problems,81 regulatory cycles,82 and trial-and-error

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.2 Stable and Presumptively Optimal Rules, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• small, stable, less interconnected societies with limited upward mobility
• limited and readily identifiable sets of regulatory issues

mechanismsupport: arguedinstitutional-design

• extends kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-008 Because rulemaking is subject to regulatory cycles and to a classic collective action problem, rules are gener...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/104bfbdf303ce12a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-020.md | sha256sum