kaal:claim:2811718-018

Successful claims based on lacking investor due diligence typically require a complete failure to perform due diligence despite explicit promises to perform it; promising due diligence and then conducting none except in isolated incidents is actionable misrepresentation.

Successful lawsuits in the context of lacking IDD typically require a complete lack of due diligence despite explicit promises to perform such due diligence.90 Promising to conduct due diligence and then failing to conduct any (except in isolated incidents), is actionable misrepresentation.

Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016), III.B.1. Legal Standards, p. 32
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718

• private fund due diligence litigation
• explicit promise to perform due diligence

conditionsupport: arguedlaw-and-legal-systems

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b52152af561288173840a1cabbcf8f4b337e73507c856ee01600799073f4156f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5c5a4134a2ea7fc8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-018.md | sha256sum