kaal:claim:2811718-034

The legal standards applicable to private fund investor due diligence are somewhat inconsistent and suboptimal and merit clarification.

Source quote, verbatim

This study has demonstrated that the legal standards applicable to private fund IDD are somewhat inconsistent and suboptimal, and merit clarification.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016), IV. Discussion, p. 60
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718

Holds when

United States case law from 1995 to 2015

Classification

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: inconsistent legal standardsfamily: definitional-ambiguitylaw-and-legal-systems

Related claims

restated_by kaal:claim:2998097-030 The legal standards applicable to private fund investor due diligence are somewhat inconsistent and suboptimal...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b52152af561288173840a1cabbcf8f4b337e73507c856ee01600799073f4156f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/af0552a3a6215c54...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-034.md | sha256sum