kaal:claim:2811729-001

The proliferation of unconstrained mutual funds calls into question whether the retail investor protections built into the Investment Company Act of 1940 remain effective.

Source quote, verbatim
The proliferation of unconstrained mutual funds calls into question the effectiveness of retail investor protections under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016), Abstract, p. 2
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Disclosure regime outpaced by product complexityfamily: disclosure-ineffectivenessprivate-funds

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0877b0a076f2614559cb0b1a736f73401cecbee7cfe014da6e36709208e92a74. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c17dbecae6f8c8d3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811729-001.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim