kaal:claim:2811729-038

The SEC should re-evaluate its reliance on the Company Act's disclosure regime in its current form as the best means of protecting retail investors from the risks of investing in unconstrained mutual funds.

Source quote, verbatim
Regardless of the SEC's reason for inaction, the authors believe that the SEC should re-evaluate its reliance on the Company Act's disclosure regime in its current form as the best means of protecting retail investors in relation to the risks posed by investing in UMFs.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016), VI. Conclusion, p. 54
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729

Holds when
Classification

normativesupport: argueddisclosuresecurities-law

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0877b0a076f2614559cb0b1a736f73401cecbee7cfe014da6e36709208e92a74. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/751000f777575940...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811729-038.md | sha256sum