kaal:claim:2811729-040

The absence of any current requirement to present unconstrained portfolio risks in detail raises the question whether unconstrained mutual fund prospectuses provide the adequate, accurate, and explicit information required by Section 1(b)(1) of the Company Act.

Source quote, verbatim
seems to raise the question of whether UMF prospectuses at present provide "adequate, accurate, and explicit information, fairly presented, concerning the character of [mutual fund] securities," as required by Section 1(b)(1) of the Company Act.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016), VI. Conclusion, footnote 217, p. 55
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Prospectus may not meet the statutory adequacy standardfamily: disclosure-ineffectivenesssecurities-lawdisclosure

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0877b0a076f2614559cb0b1a736f73401cecbee7cfe014da6e36709208e92a74. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/91ba481d3f209204...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811729-040.md | sha256sum