kaal:claim:2816408-017

A fuzzy regression discontinuity design was run to test whether the discontinuity occurred at a date other than March 30, 2012, on the theory that advisers may have anticipated compliance costs in the preceding months.

Source quote, verbatim

The reason for implementing FRD is that hedge fund advisers may have anticipated the costs of compliance with mandatory disclosure in the months preceding the enactment of the Dodd Frank Act.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016), 5.2.2. Regression Discontinuity, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408

Holds when

entire sample
anticipation of compliance costs before the effective date

Classification

designsupport: arguedresearch-methods

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is dc3b2f9e60e42ea1b42c2e0062d65569675b014c05fcd30b15ad44d2410b2ce7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/2b66d5755d3fbff3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2816408-017.md | sha256sum