kaal:claim:2816408-018

The sharp and fuzzy regression discontinuity approaches yield results of only minor difference in this setting because the denominator of the fuzzy estimator is very close to one, meaning treatment take up at the threshold is nearly deterministic.

However, because the denominator is very close to 1 in our investigation, empirical results show that the differences between the SRD and the FRD approach are of minor importance.

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016), 5.2.2. Regression Discontinuity, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408

• this sample and threshold
• denominator close to 1

empiricalsupport: evidencedresearch-methods

• restates kaal:claim:2389416-024 Because the compliance probability denominator is very close to one, fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is dc3b2f9e60e42ea1b42c2e0062d65569675b014c05fcd30b15ad44d2410b2ce7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/4ed9578894d4b8f2...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2816408-018.md | sha256sum