kaal:claim:2816408-024

Around the registration effective date, whether a fund's AUM sits above or below the $150 million regulatory threshold does not play a significant role in explaining hedge fund returns for the entire sample.

close to the registration effective date for hedge fund advisers under the Dodd-Frank Act, the size of AUM, above or below the regulatory threshold of $150 million, does not play a significant role in explaining hedge fund returns of the entire sample.

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016), 5.2.1. Linear Regression, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408

• entire sample of 3,424 funds
• months surrounding March 30, 2012

empiricalsupport: evidencedprivate-fundssecurities-law

• contests kaal:claim:2389416-003 The hedge fund adviser registration requirement under the Dodd-Frank Act creates a discontinuity in hedge fund...
• contests kaal:claim:2389416-037 Despite the great volatility of hedge fund adviser returns over the observation period, the empirical evidence...
• supersedes kaal:claim:2389416-007 Hedge fund adviser registration under the Dodd-Frank Act positively affects adviser returns in March 2012, but...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is dc3b2f9e60e42ea1b42c2e0062d65569675b014c05fcd30b15ad44d2410b2ce7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6a8fdfc4f329067f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2816408-024.md | sha256sum