Relative to existing work, this study uses a much larger dataset and a more sophisticated empirical approach, regression discontinuity, and finds no statistical evidence for an effect of Dodd-Frank Act requirements on private fund advisers' performance.
Source quote, verbatim
Compared with the existing prior work, in this study, we use a much larger dataset and a more sophisticated empirical approach such as regression discontinuity. We find no statistical evidence for an effect of the requirements introduced by the Dodd-Frank Act on private fund advisers' performance.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016), 7. DISCUSSION & FUTURE RESEARCH, p. 13 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Private Fund Performance – Evidence from 2010 – 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2816408
Holds when
comparison to prior studies of Dodd-Frank effects on private funds
Classification
empiricalsupport: evidencedresearch-methods
Related claims
restated_bykaal:claim:2998097-020 Using a regression discontinuity design around the 150 million dollar registration threshold with five years o...
supersedeskaal:claim:2389416-022 The discontinuity in hedge fund earnings at the registration effective date is positive, which is the opposite...
supersedeskaal:claim:2389416-003 The hedge fund adviser registration requirement under the Dodd-Frank Act creates a discontinuity in hedge fund...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is dc3b2f9e60e42ea1b42c2e0062d65569675b014c05fcd30b15ad44d2410b2ce7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b1fc29a72e3d7755...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2816408-033.md | sha256sum