kaal:claim:2831040-010

An existing regulatory infrastructure built on stable and presumptively optimal rules is largely incapable of addressing the ever increasing unknown future contingencies associated with disruptive innovation.

the existing regulatory infrastructure with stable and presumptively optimal rules is largely incapable of addressing the ever-increasing unknown future contingencies associated with disruptive innovation

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016), II. Law's Diminishing Capacity to React to Innovation, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

• disruptive innovation

failuresupport: arguedfailure: contingency blindness of stable rulesfamily: rule-obsolescence-and-ossificationinnovation

• restated_by kaal:claim:2957645-004 The existing regulatory infrastructure, resting on stable and presumptively optimal rules, is largely incapabl...
• extends kaal:claim:2808132-003 In an environment of exponential disruptive innovation, the information rulemakers need is less likely to mate...
• generalizes kaal:claim:4796714-025 Strict legacy regulation built on stable and presumptively optimal rules and enforced at the AI development st...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c51adf20ad7dcf6c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-010.md | sha256sum