kaal:claim:2831040-017

The doctrine of stare decisis and judicial adherence to precedent decided decades or centuries earlier mean the court system is structurally a suspension system for rapid change, built to supply stability and predictability rather than speed.

The doctrine of stare decisis and the courts' adherence to and application of precedent decided decades or centuries earlier illustrate that the court system is actually structured as a suspension system for rapid change in order to provide stability and predictability.

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016), IV.1 Remedying the Pacing Problem, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

• common law court systems bound by precedent

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: courts as suspension system for changefamily: rule-obsolescence-and-ossificationlaw-and-legal-systemsinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/57c42b7bc150cd7a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-017.md | sha256sum