kaal:claim:2834531-025

Contesting the safety rationale offered for restricting Uber, the authors argue that the two way rating system and the algorithmic matching of drivers and customers already provide an effective means of policing drivers and ensuring a safe ride.

Source quote, verbatim

The two–way rating system (drivers rate customers and customers rate drivers) and an algorithm–based system for matching up drivers and customers appear to offer an effective means of policing Uber drivers and ensuring a safe ride for customers.

From

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017), A. Facts Today, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531 · source PDF

Cite as

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

Holds when

ride hailing platforms with reciprocal ratings and algorithmic matching

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedreputationrisk-and-incentives

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c576a24e23ddf301...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-025.md | sha256sum