kaal:claim:2834531-029

The response to contested facts should not be to abandon facts, but to identify alternative grounds for regulation that would make the regulation of innovative products and services more effective and more legitimate.

And yet, rather than abandoning facts, we should be thinking about some alternative grounds for regulation that would allow the regulation of innovative products and services to be more effective and legitimate.

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017), B. A Post-Fact Society?, p. 24
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531 · source PDF

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

normativesupport: argueddynamic-regulation

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0224c86889800526...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-029.md | sha256sum