kaal:claim:2939127-026

Because the legal origin of smart contracting is unsettled, lawyers may argue that smart contracts are void and unenforceable under the law even where the smart contract accurately reflects the parties' underlying agreement.

Source quote, verbatim
While smart contracts may reflect the underlying contract between parties, lawyers may argue that "smart contracts" are void and unenforceable under the law.
From

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017), III.4. Limitations, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127 · source PDF

Cite as

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: smart-contract-unenforceabilityfamily: legal-personality-and-liability-gapsmart-contractslaw-and-legal-systemsrisk-and-incentives

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/038e99f087c26b86...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-026.md | sha256sum