kaal:claim:2992962-003

If the jurisdictional means necessary for conflict resolution mechanisms covering Ethereum blockchain based smart contracting are absent, consumers will mistrust the new technology, and that mistrust can undermine the evolution of the blockchain based crypto economy.

Not having the required jurisdictional means necessary for conflict resolution mechanisms for Ethereum blockchain-based smart contracting, may invoke consumer mistrust in the new technology. This can then undermine the evolution of the blockchain-based crypto economy.

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), I. Introduction, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

• Ethereum blockchain based smart contracting

predictivesupport: arguedfailure: governance-vacuum-mistrustfamily: enforcement-gapreputationlaw-and-legal-systemseconomicssmart-contracts

• extended_by kaal:claim:3125822-001 The crypto economy can continue to develop without falling back on centralized regulating authorities only if ...
• extends kaal:claim:2922176-020 Blockchain-based smart contracts in digital marketplaces are the technology most likely to extend and lead the...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c6a59f3c43aee2a8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-003.md | sha256sum