kaal:claim:2992962-010

The authors treat the near absence of decided case law on crypto smart contracting disputes as evidence that the existing legal infrastructure is too far removed from crypto dispute resolution, or incapable of adequately addressing the disputes crypto transactions generate.

Source quote, verbatim

We see this lack of existing case law in the context of crypto smart contracting disputes as evidence that the existing legal infrastructure may be too far removed from crypto dispute resolution or incapable of adequately addressing the types of disputes generated by crypto transactions.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), a) Courts on Cryptocurrencies and DLT Businesses, p. 32
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Holds when

US federal and state case law searched before publication in 2017

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedsystemic-risklaw-and-legal-systems

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9734f455e6ca2813...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-010.md | sha256sum